High concurrency can expose subtle performance bottlenecks in SQL Server, particularly those stemming from spinlocks and latch contention. Both mechanisms exist to synchronize access to shared data structures, yet they operate differently and require distinct troubleshooting approaches. By recognizing how they work and knowing what causes them to overload a system, DBAs can reduce CPU spikes, timeouts, and overall application slowdowns.
Category: Locking
Reading SQL Server’s XML Deadlock Report Captured by the system_health Event
SQL Server includes an Extended Events session called system_health, which runs by default and, among other things, captures information about deadlocks as they occur. When two or more sessions block each other in such a way that no progress can be made (a deadlock), SQL Server chooses one session as the “victim,” rolls back its transaction, and frees resources so other sessions can continue. By reviewing the deadlock report in the system_health session’s XML output, you can see precisely why the deadlock happened and identify which queries or procedures were involved.
Understanding and Resolving TempDB Contention in SQL Server
TempDB contention is a common challenge in SQL Server when running highly concurrent workloads. In this post, we will explore why it occurs, how to identify it, and some practical solutions—especially leveraging In-Memory OLTP and memory-optimized table variables.
Using sp_getapplock to Prevent Concurrent Execution of Stored Procedures in SQL Server
In multi-user database environments, ensuring the integrity and consistency of data is essential. One common challenge is preventing multiple instances of the same stored procedure from executing at the same time, which can lead to data conflicts, race conditions, and unpredictable results. To address this, SQL Server provides a powerful tool called sp_getapplock. This post explains what sp_getapplock is, what you are actually locking when you use it, how to implement it to prevent concurrent executions of a stored procedure, and the difference between transaction-level and session-level locks.
Determining When to Optimize SQL Server Workloads Versus Upgrading Hardware
When your SQL Server isn’t performing as expected, it’s tempting to think that upgrading hardware is the quick fix. More CPUs, extra memory, faster disks—they all sound like solutions that should solve the problem. But before you start investing in new equipment, it’s worth taking a step back to see if optimization can address the issues.
Diagnosing and Resolving Last Page Insert Contention in SQL Server
In high-concurrency environments, SQL Server databases may experience performance bottlenecks due to contention issues. One common issue is Last Page Insert Contention, which occurs when multiple sessions attempt to insert records into the last page of an index simultaneously. This contention can lead to significant wait times and reduced performance, particularly in tables with ever-increasing key columns. We will look at page insert contention and give recommendations for improvement.
Using TRUNCATE TABLE with Table Partitions in SQL Server
In SQL Server, the TRUNCATE TABLE command is often favored over DELETE for its efficiency when removing data from a table. However, when working with partitioned tables, the locking behavior changes slightly. Additionally, the LOCK_ESCALATION = AUTO setting can further optimize performance by managing lock escalation at the partition level. We explore how these features interact, providing an in-depth look at locking behavior when truncating partitioned tables and the role of LOCK_ESCALATION = AUTO.